in

Paul McFedries' Tech Tonic

Making the world a better place, one computer book at a time

Lingua Techna

Technology, language, and technical writing (plus some interesting stuff, too)

Why shouldn't we coin new words?

Writing in today's Chicago Sun-Times, columnist Neil Steinberg offers the following aside, which includes a wonderful neology-related story about Noah Webster:

The British had extra incentives to dislike us — we were breakaway ingrates, of course. But we also had kidnapped their language and were degrading it, creating new words and giving new meanings to solid old words, words that had served England well for centuries. (A British traveler, Capt. Basil Hall, actually confronted Noah Webster, who had the audacity to compile these American offenses into a book, a dictionary, as if it were an actual language and not a shameful Creole. The elderly Webster stood his ground, demanding: Why shouldn't Americans coin new words? "Because there are words enough already," the Brit replied, characteristically).


Published Nov 10 2008, 12:29 PM by Paul
Filed under:

Comments

 

jasonsurety said:

I think we should. Especially in the case of creating adverbs from adjectives by adding an 'ly'. For instance, why not create the word xerophilously from xerophilous - things could be said to live xerophilously.  

Another example of word that in my opinion should be coined is chalant. Why can we be nonchalant but not chalant?

December 29, 2008 12:46 PM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add
Copyright © 2008 Logophilia Limited and Paul McFedries
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems