<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mcfedries.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Unkindest Cut</title><link>http://mcfedries.com/cs/blogs/paul/archive/2007/09/28/the-unkindest-cut.aspx</link><description>I love Ellen Ullman &amp;#39;s writing. Her prose is crystal clear and as just-so as a well-designed algorithm. She&amp;#39;s a literary geek who doesn&amp;#39;t try to hide her geekiness. I was recently reading her programming-focused (but still excellent, even</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>re: The Unkindest Cut</title><link>http://mcfedries.com/cs/blogs/paul/archive/2007/09/28/the-unkindest-cut.aspx#30</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:01:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a08f0b5d-4375-4caf-9394-70231f530157:30</guid><dc:creator>loldog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So let me get this straight: technical writers are &amp;quot;at the bottom of the heap,&amp;quot; but &amp;quot;trainers...knew even less than&amp;quot; them. So doesn&amp;#39;t that put trainers at the bottom of the heap?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://mcfedries.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Unkindest Cut</title><link>http://mcfedries.com/cs/blogs/paul/archive/2007/09/28/the-unkindest-cut.aspx#28</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:28:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a08f0b5d-4375-4caf-9394-70231f530157:28</guid><dc:creator>bugsyboy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ouch, indeed. Don&amp;#39;t worry, though, Paul: we think you know more than the testers ;-).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://mcfedries.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>